Amid Transition, School is Poised for a Promising Future

A School in Transition

When she applied to teach at the George Washington University, Crystel Farina, Ph.D.(c), RN, CNE, CHSE, knew very little about the School of Nursing or the university. “I applied solely because the dean was Pamela Jeffries,” said Ms. Farina, director of simulation and experiential learning.

Crystel Farina aiding students in PPE fitting
Ms. Farina aiding students during on campus PPE fitting

A doctoral candidate at Notre Dame of Maryland University, Ms. Farina joined the Nursing School in August 2017. She had been aware of Dr. Jeffries, Ph.D., RN, FAAN, ANEF, FSSH, and her work on simulation since 2004, when Ms. Farina was teaching at Chesapeake College in Maryland and grew interested in simulation and nursing education.

“She was the one in all the articles who was teaching me how to actually do simulations,” Ms. Farina said of Dr. Jeffries, whom she first met in 2015 at the National League for Nursing’s Leadership Development for Simulation Educators. Dr. Jeffries was one of the “giants of simulation,” who formed a faculty group leading the program.

“It was like seeing a rockstar,” she said. “Oh my gosh, it’s her!”

Dr. Jeffries, who recently stepped down as dean at the School of Nursing—a role she held from 2015 to 2021—to become dean of Vanderbilt University’s nursing school, turned out to be “very down to earth, very relaxed, and very warm and fuzzy,” Ms. Farina recalled.

Crystel Farina

“I applied solely because the dean was Pamela Jeffries. She was the one in all the articles who was teaching me how to actually do simulations.”

– Ms. Farina


“Once I got over the awe of sitting with the godmother of simulation, it was very easy to have a conversation and talk about what we were doing at the college level, what we needed to do for nurse practitioners, and simulation in health care education,” Ms. Farina said.

This characterization of Dr. Jeffries as a down-to-earth, amicable rockstar is a common refrain among those who know and have worked with her. And the dean’s departure to Nashville, Tenn., comes amid a larger transitional time at the school and at GW.

Of course, the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted many best-laid plans. From an academic and administrative perspective, the School of Nursing was lucky to have put certain programs and processes in place prior to the pandemic, which helped mitigate some remote- and digital-only growing pains.

Pamela Slaven-Lee, D.N.P., FNP-C, FAANP, CHSE, senior associate dean for academic affairs and clinical associate professor, now serves as interim dean of the School of Nursing. GW recently announced that Mark Wrighton, chancellor emeritus at Washington University in St. Louis, will begin serving as interim president in January and will fill that role for up to a year and a half.The School of Nursing was about two-thirds of the way into its strategic plan when the pandemic began, requiring that in-person activities shut down in mid-March 2020. Despite this hurdle, the faculty and staff were able to fulfill the goals of that plan. And, although her departure was eminent, Dr. Jeffries saw to it that the next strategic plan was in place before she left. As she and her colleagues reflect on her legacy and vast achievements at GW, they see a bright future for the school, which has already earned national accolades that are more typical of much older and more mature schools.

The View from ‘Athens of the South’

Reached by video chat in Nashville, Dr. Jeffries said she hopes people will look back on her GW legacy as six years of bringing the school to another level. “We grew—maybe from adolescence to young adulthood,” she said.

Dr. Jeffries is very proud of starting GW’s doctoral nursing program and building up the breadth and depth of the school’s research base. “It still needs to grow more, but the quantity and quality of our research efforts have definitely scaled up,” she said. She also takes pride in the school’s No. 22 ranking for nursing graduate education by U.S. News & World Report and successful school-wide health policy branding.

Joe Velez speaking with construction crew at VSTC
Joe Velez, GW Nursing’s Executive Director of Operations, speaking with crew at remodel project

Six years ago, when Dr. Jeffries came to GW—after serving as vice provost for digital initiatives at Johns Hopkins University, and before that as an associate dean at Hopkins and at Indiana University Bloomington—her priorities were to build upon the foundation her predecessor, Jean Johnson, established as founding dean some five years prior. Having inherited high-quality programs, Dr. Jeffries wanted to take the school to the next level.

“I had an analogy of a three-story house. Dr. Johnson built the first floor. I had the second floor, which continued to build on our reputable programs,” Dr. Jeffries said. “To build the research base on the third level, I wanted to start a Ph.D. program and to diversify revenue, because we were very tied to tuition dollars and enrollment numbers.”

Dr. Jeffries started a professional development office called Ventures, Initiatives and Partnerships (VIP), and she sought to improve the school’s national rankings. She aimed in five years to move the school into the top 25 graduate programs in the U.S. News & World Report rankings. (It previously ranked No. 58.) It took six years, but the school bested that goal by three slots.

Pamela Jeffries headshot

“I had an analogy of a three-story house. Dr. Johnson built the first floor. I had the second floor, which continued to build on our reputable programs,”

– Dr. Jeffries


In the 2022 U.S. News rankings (the Georgetown-based publication ranks schools based on the prior year’s data, which can sound like predicting the future), the Nursing School is also tied for No. 28 in the category of “Best Nursing Schools: Doctor of Nursing Practice” with Oregon Health and Science University; University of California, San Francisco; University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston; and Washington State University.

In the U.S. News specialty nursing school rankings, the GW School of Nursing is No. 8 in “Best Master’s Nurse Practitioner: Family,” and is tied for No. 6 in “Best Master’s Nursing Administration” with University of Alabama at Birmingham and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. And in the U.S. News online nursing program rankings, GW is No. 2 for “Best Online Master’s Nursing Programs for Veterans,”No. 3 for “Best Online Master’s Nursing Administration Programs,”No. 7 for “Best Online Master’s Nursing Programs (tied with University of Nevada, Las Vegas), and No. 7 for “Best Online Family Nurse Practitioner Master’s Programs.”

Creating a doctoral program to help train nursing scientists was necessary to become a top-tier school, according to Dr. Jeffries, who also is proud of starting the school’s Center for Health Policy and Media Engagement. The latter draws upon the school’s location in the nation’s capital.

“I don’t think I would have changed anything if I could have read the tea leaves and known COVID was going to hit in March 2020,” Dr. Jeffries says. “In fact, we actually prepared ourselves not knowing it was happening.”

Pivoting Online 

Prior to March 2020, the Nursing School had already begun assembling the necessary personnel to strengthen its creation and delivery of online programming. Dr. Jeffries hired e-learning specialists, instructional designers, videographers, a graphic designer, and a director of online learning and technology.

“I’m glad that was done, because that served us well in COVID,” she said. “We already had online education going at GW Nursing, but I put more resources and support into building a team.”

She also brought on a team to help run the expanded simulation center on the Ashburn, Va., campus, home to a state-of-the-art Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) center. “They had to pivot during COVID to produce and really facilitate faculty with the virtual simulations,” Dr. Jeffries said. And after lockdowns ended, that team facilitated safe in-person lab simulations.

Karen Whitt monitoring OSCEs
Associate Professor Dr. Karen Whitt monitoring OSCEs at VSTC simulation lab

During the pandemic, Dr. Jeffries would wake up each morning and ask herself what she needed to get through the day.

“I built community with our faculty, staff, and students,” she said. There were weekly town hall meetings for nearly 70 weeks, and Dr. Jeffries helped staff leaders, who had never managed people remotely, and professors, who could not see their students in person, navigate the new normal.

“We did keep community together,” she said, noting the school’s instructional continuity in particular. “Our students graduated on time for the most part.”

“Some of us thought—I was one—we could come back in three or four weeks,” she said of the beginning of the pandemic. “I stayed very focused to get through. I always had to hold it together. Someone has to be the leader.”

Looking forward, Dr. Jeffries notes that telehealth is poised to be a game changer for the profession, and she expects the pivot online will continue even after the pandemic is in the rearview mirror. There is a need for telehealth competencies and full integration into curricula, she said, and nursing schools ought to teach students to assess patients via digital platforms, such as Zoom. Patients are also increasingly tracking their own health data, something nurses should take advantage of.

“We’ve got to be mindful of that,” Dr. Jeffries said.

She looks forward to continuing to see the School of Nursing’s programs flourish, as well as new programs emerge. She expects the healthcare landscape to continue to change, and thinks public health is a priority, particularly the focus on health equity that COVID exposed, as outlined in the National Academy of Medicine’s report “The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity.”

“I see the next five years as a little different. Right now we are transitioning in COVID, but we are still in COVID. But our antennas are up for different things,” she said. “I think we’ve learned we can do things differently.”

Big Shoes to Fill

Dr. Slaven-Lee, now interim dean, came to GW two months before Dr. Jeffries did in 2015. She was excited to join a young school, about five years old, and the opportunities that its youth presented. Dr. Slaven-Lee served previously in a leadership role at Georgetown University and looked forward to returning to teaching. That was not in the cards, however.

“Dr. Jeffries developed our matrix structure with two communities and academic programs, and made a lot of infrastructure changes. With that, it opened up a lot of leadership opportunities,” Dr. Slaven-Lee said. “I came here saying, ‘I want to go back to teaching and not so much leadership.’ As is often the case, I ended up back in a leadership role.

Interim Dean Slaven-Lee at vaccine clinic
Interim Dean Slaven-Lee (center), Patsy Deyo and Assistant Professor Dr. Maggie Venzke meet with Va. Del. David Reid at GW Nursing-run COVID-19 Vaccination Clinic.

”Dr. Slaven-Lee worked closely with Dr. Jeffries on developing the simulation program, which “became a signature part of our academic programs,” and building the academic affairs unit. “Really further developing all the things that you do as your school continues to mature—evaluation plans, standardizing how you evaluate your academic programs, master plans of evaluation, standardizing how you evaluate each course, clinical placement models, all those sorts of things,”she said.

In the past six years, Dr. Slaven-Lee has seen GW’s reputation soar and has noticed changes in the applicant pool. She does not think anyone else applied for the same job she did in 2015, but now, “The caliber of the candidates that we see trying to come to GW and join our faculty community is outstanding.”

Part of that, she thinks, is the national recognition the school has received in rankings. “Considering how young the school is—we’re 11 years old—that’s absolutely remarkable that we’ve been able to accomplish that,” she said.

Since becoming interim dean on July 1, Dr. Slaven-Lee has drawn on what she learned from working with Dr. Jeffries, whom she called “a great mentor.” She also is very focused on the school’s strategic plan.“

The strategy I have in my mind is to stay focused on the school. Stay focused on our students, faculty, staff, and strategic plan,” she said. She is also focused on enhancing the curriculum with an eye toward diversity, equity, and inclusion, she said, as well as the “Future of Nursing”report.

Pamela Slaven-Lee

“The caliber of the candidates that we see trying to come to GW and join our faculty community is outstanding.”

– Dr. Slaven-Lee


“It’s not just, ‘Hold everything steady until a new dean comes.’ It’s ‘Continue on the upward trajectory.’ Holding things steady would be a disservice to the school. We’ve got to keep things moving upwards,” she said. “I’d be derelict in my duty if I just tried to hold things steady. When you’re ranked 22, that takes some work. You can’t just hold steady. You’ll fall backwards.”

Dr. Slaven-Lee expects the school’s rankings to continue to improve, and like Dr. Jeffries, she anticipates that there will be online and hybrid programming and teaching in the future. She also echoed Dr. Jeffries’ thinking about the school’s unique role in the heart of Washington, D.C.,and in northern Virginia.

“We want very much to brand and distinguish ourselves as the school of nursing that’s about health policy,” she said, noting that most GW School of Nursing researchers focus on health disparities and inequities.

“The juncture where it all starts coming together is the research informing the policy informing the practice. It’s not something we are trying to be. It’s something we are actually becoming,” she said. “We want to leverage our position in the nation’s capital.” The school also developed a dual Master of Science in Nursing and Master of Public Health degree, which matches renewed interest in that intersection.

She aims, she said, to fill Dr. Jeffries’ big shoes.“Dean Jeffries is an incredible leader. She is very well known for being a great communicator. She always had a vision,” Dr. Slaven-Lee said. “She did so much in the just six years she was here.”

The Power of Simulations 

Dr. Slaven-Lee, Dr. Jeffries, and Ms. Farina—the director of simulation and experiential learning, who chose to apply to work at GW because of Dr. Jeffries—all point to simulation as one of the areas of greatest change at the School of Nursing in the past five years.

Dr. Slaven-Lee said it was “absolutely pivotal for the development of our programs” to require all faculty to be trained in best practices for simulations. “Simulation is a pedagogy that is incredibly powerful. By virtue of that, if it’s used inappropriately, it can have negative impacts on the students’ evaluation and development,” she said.

Simulation training on campus is also a signature event for the school and for students. “These are big events. That’s how they know the campus. It’s about developing alumni. We’re known in the community for being expert simulationists,” she said. And many professional societies and vendors come to GW for talks on best practice simulation.

GW Nursing students in VSTC Simulation Lab
GW Nursing students in virtual reality simulation room.

“It’s not uncommon to see a whole panel of GW faculty talking about simulation,” Dr. Slaven-Lee said.

Ms. Farina’s tenure at GW has seen sustained growth in the school, she said. When she began working at the school, there was summer enrollment for the first time; there had only been spring and fall terms previously. And some of the conferences and other events that provided the most momentum in pushing the school forward centered on simulation.

Much of that success is owed to Dr. Jeffries, who played an essential role in securing funding for renovations of the simulation center and for expanding its offerings.

“She was really supportive in ensuring that I had the authority to request that all faculty had a standard of education for simulation before they came and facilitated simulation experiences,” Ms. Farina said. She noted that Dr. Jeffries was also involved in creating a massive open online course (MOOC), in which more than11,000 learners have enrolled and participated.

GW Nursing School students now do a lot of virtual and face-to-face simulations, and the curriculum is aligned with didactic content, skills labs, and simulations.“It’s all lined up that way so that they can apply everything they learned each week to providing simulated patient care,” she said. “They sit in lectures; then they learn a few skills; and then they are able to apply all that knowledge to providing care for that simulated patient.”

Ms. Farina hopes the nursing program continues to expand and thinks the school has a shot at top 10 in the U.S. News rankings. She also expects the school to become, in the next two years, one of 2,000 accredited by the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. “It shows that our simulation is high fidelity, high quality,” she said of that accreditation.

Collaborative Culture

Majeda El-Banna, Ph.D., RN, CNE, ANEF, had previously taught at several nursing programs, large and small, stateside and abroad—including Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, where she was dean of the School of Nursing—before arriving at GW in 2013. She began as adjunct professor and is now associate professor, chair of acute and chronic care faculty community, and director of the Registered Nurse to Bachelor/Master of Science in Nursing (RN to BSN) program.

“GW really attracted me with the mission and vision,” she said. And when she started teaching at the school eight years ago, “I said, Oh my goodness!This is the place where I want to be.” She has been extremely happy at GW since.

Majeda El-Banna
Dr. Majeda El-Banna speaking to a classroom of Accelerated B.S.N. students.

Where some of her colleagues may think the School of Nursing’s growth has been meteoric, Dr. El-Banna, who has taught in nursing programs for more than 20 years, was part of one school that tripled in size in two years. That was a little more of a dramatic pace than she has seen at GW.

Still, when she first arrived on campus, the nursing program was small enough that communication could occur in a more ad hoc fashion. As the school grew, there needed to be more formalized processes.

She credits Dr. Jeffries’ establishment of the Ph.D. program as a very significant and difficult feat, and the faculty communities that Dr. Jeffries pioneered—the school’s take on departments—have facilitated growth, cooperation, and mentorship. When Dr. El-Banna compares Dr. Jeffries’ approach to communication between faculty and staff, spread across the Foggy Bottom and Virginia campuses and many others remote across the country, to those she has observed at other schools, she thinks what the School of Nursing has achieved is remarkable in this regard.

During Dr. Jeffries’ tenure, faculty was encouraged to collaborate on research, and research funding increased. A buddy system paired new hires in their first year with seasoned colleagues who helped them acclimate to GW. And the dean also welcomed faculty, staff, and students to her home regularly, including for holiday parties.

Majeda El-Banna

“GW really attracted me with the mission and vision. I said, Oh my goodness! This is the place where I want to be.”

– Dr. El-Banna


“How did she have the time to hold so many social events in her house?” Dr. El-Banna wondered. “That is different from other schools.”

The “culture of collaboration” at the School of Nursing is one of the things that attracted Dr. El-Banna initially, and which has kept her happily at the school. Dr. Jeffries would ask faculty members where they saw themselves in a few years, and once she knew their plans, would provide guidance on necessary future steps. She would also keep her eyes and ears open for future opportunities, which she would share with faculty.

“I don’t know how she remembers all the things about all the faculty,” Dr. El-Banna said. “It’s amazing.”

When she reflected more on the changes she has seen at GW during Dr. Jeffries’ tenure, and the culture she foresees continuing, Dr. El-Banna reached for an affable metaphor. “It feels more like a family,” she said.

AUTHOR Menachem Wecker


GW Nursing Seeks to Advance Science and Education, Sees Strong Start to Ph.D. Program

Nursing PhD students

As they undertake research they hope will translate to better patient outcomes and health care practices, GW Nursing’s first-ever Doctor of Philosophy in Nursing students are setting a high bar for those who will come after them. 

The Ph.D. program launched in fall 2019. Although GW Nursing had already offered a doctoral-level degree–the Doctor of Nursing Practice (D.N.P.)–the Ph.D. program aims to prepare students interested in nursing science and education.  

“Upon graduation, a nurse scientist will address research questions that are most relevant to the care of patients, educational needs of students and policy goals of our profession,” said Kathleen Griffith, Ph.D., M.P.H., CRNP-F, assistant dean of the Ph.D. program and newly minted associate dean for research. “Nurses study clinical problems that we are in a unique position to manage–such as symptom management, family distress and decision making around preventive health care. The purpose of our research is to build the knowledge base of our profession, which will enhance our care of patients, improve education of our students and change the way health care is delivered.” 

Eleven students, each with a range of experiences in nursing and health care, are currently enrolled in the three-year, full-time 57-credit program, which is delivered in an executive-style format.  

The six students in the first cohort are now completing their core coursework; the second cohort, with five students, started in fall 2020. A third cohort will have an orientation in July and begin studies in the fall semester, Dr. Griffith said. 

First cohort students Michelle Clausen, M.S.N., CNM, and Noelle Herrier, PMHNP, have centered their research on improving outcomes for two populations that too often slip through the cracks. 

Michelle Clausen
Michelle Clausen, GW Nursing Ph. D. student

After earning her undergraduate degree in public health from GW and then working at a Washington, D.C., area health-focused nonprofit, Clausen returned to GW, first earning a B.S.N. and then an M.S.N. with a concentration in nurse-midwifery. 

She started her nursing career as a Midwifery Fellow and then as a full-time faculty member at the midwifery service at GW Medical Faculty Associates. These roles also came with the opportunity to teach students–from those in medical and nursing school to emerging midwives and medical residents—which has become another passion for Clausen. Since beginning her Ph.D. studies, Clausen has continued to work clinically as a nurse-midwife for the University of Maryland. 

Clausen’s clinical experiences motivated her to return to school and is the inspiration behind her research focus. 

“I have witnessed the system fall short for women and pregnant persons,” she said. “I’ve seen barriers that certified nurse-midwives have faced in providing high-quality, evidence-based compassionate care, despite this type of care continuously providing significant outcomes.” 

On the other hand, she has had the opportunity, through mentors and other experiences, to see midwifery at its very best. 

Clausen’s research interests include matters related to the nation’s growing maternal morbidity and mortality rates; barriers to access to care; innovations in women’s health; and the vast spiritual needs of pregnant individuals. She is now focused on testing spiritual needs assessment tools with pregnant women. 

“Spiritual health has been studied throughout medicine and associated with various positive health outcomes, and I would like to help bring this to those experiencing pregnancy,” she said. “It is my hope that this work informs future research regarding the dynamic needs of pregnant individuals in order to improve their health and the health of their families.” 

Nicole Herrier
Noelle Herrier, GW Nursing Ph. D. student

After 13 years in clinical practice, Herrier has returned to school, hopeful that she can play a greater part in eliminating the health disparities common among mental health patients.  

Though her undergraduate degree from Northern Arizona University is in zoology, Herrier minored in chemistry with an emphasis on health professions. She returned to school to earn a B.S.N. from Arizona State and then an M.S.N. in Adult Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner at the University of Washington. There, Herrier did much of her training at Madigan Army Medical Center, focusing on the neurobiology and treatment of trauma. She now works at a Maricopa County, ArIzona, facility, providing court-ordered evaluations and treatment for those with mental health concerns. 

Her nursing career started in cardiac ICU, but mental health was always Herrier’s passion; she made time to pursue it by working with community mental health initiatives and at inpatient behavioral health facilities.  

“Throughout my career, I found that there were many barriers to my patients receiving medical care, from their psychiatric illness to their social and living situations, and I’ve even witnessed provider bias in delaying treatment,” she said.  

Herrier wants to use her Ph.D. to help change that. She says symptoms of other diseases are often overlooked in mental health patients, something that was underscored this past year, she says, as mental health patients with severe coughs were tested for COVID-19 only to discover they had advanced lung cancer.  

“The understanding that people with a serious mental illness have higher rates of mortality from cancer than those without a mental illness led me to want to research to find methods to decrease people’s mortality,” said Herrier, whose post-doctoral aspirations include joining the faculty of a university to teach and continue her research.  

Cohort 2 students Sasha DuBois, RN, M.S.N., and Burton Korer, RN-BC, D.N.P., CPHQ, have designs on using their research to change the health care industry for the better. 

Sasha DuBois
Sasha DuBois, GW Nursing Ph.D. student

DuBois was in high school when she first came to work at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Today, she is a nurse director for the hospital’s IV team and Patient Care Assistant Float Pool.  

“I started out through the Student Success Jobs Program for Boston students who were interested in health careers,” said DuBois, who joined the hospital’s nursing staff after earning a B.S.N. at Simmons University.  

She received her M.S.N. in leadership and administration from Emmanuel College; she’s pursuing her doctorate because she believes it will be a valuable asset in her goal of addressing the dearth of diversity and cultural competency in nursing.  

“Ensuring we have racially and culturally concordant providers of our patients is a very important passion of mine,” she said. “My research interests around this subject are focused on barriers that nurses of color face when completing a professional nursing program.” 

For DuBois, nursing is more than a profession, it’s a calling that beckoned to her early on. The pandemic, she says, has shown the world once again how critically important nurses are. She’s never been prouder to work in the field.  

“I love what makes a nurse, a nurse,” DuBois said.  

She’s determined to leave a mark: to make nursing better by working to knock down barriers that impede both nurses and patients. DuBois has begun that work already by volunteering at Simmons University in the Dotson Bridge and Mentoring Program, which supports African American, Latina, Asian and Native American nursing students.  

“I believe that there is room for everyone at the table,” DuBois said. “I plan to continue my career in nursing leadership while working in academia.  I can do my part to bridge the two worlds, so I may contribute to the development of the best nurses for tomorrow.”  

The COVID-19 crisis has brought the vulnerability of older adults to the forefront, but Dr. Korer says this population was in a precarious situation long before the pandemic. He enrolled in the Ph.D. program to help change that.  

“I see many elderly low-income individuals at risk due to declining health and limited access to coordinated and effective care,” he said. “My aim is to help develop nursing practices to address elderly individuals who are aging in place in senior housing.”   

Years of study and practice led him to his research focus. He worked continuously in health care as he earned his A.D.N. from Gateway Community College; B.S. in business administration and management and M.S.N. from University of Phoenix; and D.N.P. from GW. 

“Starting as a CNA, then an LPN, I have been employed in nursing full time for over 30 years, working for several large employers, and have owned my own health care company for more than 25 years,” he said.  

Dr. Korer believes one of the first steps in delivering better health outcomes for older adults and others is to ensure the right programs and initiatives are properly funded and utilized. 

“The health care system in the United States currently covers many social costs as compared to other countries (but doesn’t) always produce favorable health care outcomes,” he said. “If we can spend the resources better we can improve the lives of many more individuals.” 

After completing the program, Dr. Korer wants to share what he learns about fiscal performance and health care outcomes through teaching, lecturing and partnerships with hospitals and other health-focused organizations.

AUTHOR kevin walker


A Pioneering Model

Patsy Deyo at SON vaccination clinic

The student-run COVID-19 testing center, which got up and running in record time, offers an inspiring blueprint for the future, nursing experts say.

When Mark Tanner came to GW’s Virginia Science and Technology Campus weekly to get tested for COVID-19, the former assistant dean for the bachelor of science in nursing program parked adjacent to Enterprise Hall. He entered the building, scanned his GW badge, and walked up to the registration desk, where nursing students scannedQR codes on testees’ phones to call up their appointments, verify names and birth dates, and scan test tubes that would contain their samples. From behind plexiglass, the students—who were gloved and masked—wrote Dr. Tanner’s name and birth date on the test tube and verified his identity with his GW ID or license.

Dr. Tanner took his test tube and walked down a hall in the building’s former cafeteria, which was sufficiently capacious to accommodate the center, to one of six testing booths. If it was a busy time of day, he could wait a few minutes, but often he went right in. He would hand his test tube to the nursing student (gowned, gloved, and clad in an N95 mask and face shield), and the latter verified his birth date. Dr. Tanner had taught many of these students in first-semester didactic courses, but the students would invariably stick to protocol.

“Every experience I had, they always ask, ‘Hey. How are you? Have you done this before?’ even though they knew who I am, and they knew I’d done it before,” he said. “They’re doing the things that they should be doing. They’re neither relaxing nor taking anything off. There’s a sense of pride knowing they’ve come to our program; they’ve come this far; and they’re doing well with this very important task.

Each time, the student explained the procedure to Dr. Tanner, directed him to sit and drop his mask below his nose, and swabbed 10 seconds per nostril. The student nurse placed the swab in the test tube, broke it off and capped it, and then Dr. Tanner was ready to go. A courier picked up samples twice daily from the site, at noon and at 4 p.m., for delivery to Foggy Bottom for processing in a GW lab. Dr. Tanner usually had his results, which he could check via a mobile application, within about a day.

“It’s been very well and smoothly run,” he said. “I’m rarely there for longer than 5 to 10 minutes from the time I stand in line until the time I’m back in my car.” There’s a huge amount that happens in a very short clip, and the testing center did that more than 500 times per week at its peak. But equally as impressive is the speed with which the COVID-19 testing center was created and launched and how effective it has been during these difficult and uncertain times.

Karen Drenkard
Dr. Karen Drenkard

An ‘Aha Moment’

When GW announced in March 2020 that it would be going virtual, the School of Nursing was already well poised for online instruction, which it had been doing previously, but clinical placements became a problem when area hospitals said they couldn’t accommodate student-nurses. The Commonwealth of Virginia ruled that simulations could count for clinical experience, so that semester’s students could graduate.

“But then the new group comes in. What do you do with the new group? Summer, fall, and now spring. We really were beginning to scramble a little bit,” said Karen Drenkard, associate dean of clinical practice and community engagement. 

By early summer, Dr. Drenkard was representing the Nursing School on GW’s pandemic task force and was co-running the task force’s health and wellness subcommittee. As the university moved toward bringing essential community members back to campus, there was a need for a COVID-19 surveillance polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing program. Two testing centers were created in Foggy Bottom—one for symptomatic and the other for non-symptomatic people—and by mid-August, Dr. Drenkard had a mandate to create and operate a testing center on the Virginia campus for the 550 faculty, staff, and students, who reported there for work. 

“I’m not sure when we had the aha moment, but it’s 25 miles away, and the students have their clinical labs in Ashburn, the employees work in Ashburn, and we have housekeeping staff, faculty, students, and essential staff that are all going to be there,” Dr. Drenkard said. 

The semester was slated to begin some two or three weeks after the Nursing School received direction to start the testing center, so Dr. Drenkard—who had only been at GW for about a year—needed to move very quickly. The former chief nurse who spent a decade at the five hospitals of the Inova Health System, had served also on the Northern Virginia regional emergency preparedness disaster task force for the hospital alliance right after September 11, 2001. 

“I had a lot of disaster management experience, and I had operations experience,” she said. 

Dr. Drenkard corralled a group, which included people she hadn’t met before and who hadn’t met one another, and oriented everyone toward the goal and looming deadlines. “We were able to break down a lot of barriers very quickly,” she said. She also brought aboard two people with whom she had worked previously and upon whom she knew she could count.  

She enlisted Bonnie Sakallaris—who was chief nurse of the Alexandria, Va., hospital system and had worked with Dr. Drenkard at Inova—as the COVID-19 testing center director. “She was thinking that she was going to retire. I called her on Aug. 12 and said, ‘Would you be interested in doing this with me? I have no idea how long it’s going to last, but it’s going to be crazy. Do you want to come with me?’” Dr. Drenkard said. “She called me back in two hours and said, ‘Yes. I do.’” 

“When you’re a nursing executive or a hospital administrator in the executive suite, you stand up new programs frequently, and often without a whole lot of notice. I had never opened up a testing center before, but both Karen and I have on multiple occasions, with very little notice, developed a whole new program, staffed it, and opened it up,” Dr. Sakallaris said. “There are organizational things that you know you have to do. This was not foreign territory.” 

Dr. Drenkard also hired Patsy Deyo, M.S.N. ’14—who is in her Ph.D. dissertation phase in translational health sciences at GW’s School of Medicine and Health Sciences, and who worked previously in academic affairs at the Nursing School—to run student-nurse educational training. 

“I knew we could do it. I wasn’t sure how,” Deyo said with a laugh. “There were so many moving pieces and so many different things that had to happen in such a short time that anywhere along the lines there could have been hiccups that would have impacted our being able to do it.” 

The group secured supplies (including the highest level of personal protective equipment, PPE, that it could to protect the student nurses), drafted colleagues from different parts of the university, and found ways to involve students. (It also created and ran a flu vaccination clinic adjacent to the COVID testing center, as a “one-stop shop,” for two weeks in October.) 

“I said, ‘If I’m going to put students who aren’t licensed yet in a situation where they’re exposed to some people who could possibly have COVID, they have to have N95s, face shields, gowns, and nitrile gloves,” Dr. Drenkard said. “We used very stringent infection control, and none of my testers ever got COVID.” 

From the start, staff members were very open with the student nurses, asking how the process could improve and what challenges could be foretold and skirted. “We kept modifying what we did based on what they were seeing and said, ‘No idea was too crazy or far-out to try,’” Dr. Sakallaris said. 

Students have expressed to Dr. Sakallaris something quite similar to how she feels herself: that as the pandemic unfolded, she felt drawn to the front lines to do something useful and to be part of the solution.  

“This offers that opportunity,” she said. “It’s very gratifying to know that you’re doing something really important to manage and eventually stop this pandemic. That feels really good. It’s fun to see a plan come together.”  

And though the group went into creating the clinic expecting there would be great lessons but also initial glitches, the process went surprisingly smoothly from the start, according to Dr. Sakallaris. “There was no chaos,” she said. “It was all really well controlled.” 

students in PPE getting instructions
Nursing student volunteers in PPE receiving instructions

Charge Nurse 

Throughout the day—10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Mondays and Thursdays, and 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. on Tuesdays and Wednesdays—student nurses rotate through three roles: registrar, tester, and charge nurse. One student is charge nurse in the morning, and another takes over after lunch. That person is in charge of ensuring the center has adequate inventory and supplies, oversees lunches and breaks, and enforces social distancing and masking protocols in the center. She or he also delivers test samples to the courier for transport to the Foggy Bottom lab. 

Veronica Nguyen—who worked at the testing center during the spring 2021 semester—found it nerve wracking the first time she served as charge nurse. Only one other student from her group had held the charge nurse position before, and Nguyen trained with Dr. Sakallaris and with that previous charge nurse.  

“You worry about keeping everyone happy and running daily operations as smoothly as you can,” Nguyen said. “Especially for someone with limited leadership experience, it can be daunting to delegate tasks and make decisions. However, developing my leadership skills in a setting like the testing center was incredibly helpful.” 

Faculty provided a safe learning environment to facilitate student growth and development, and debrief sessions at the end of the day helped the team address collectively issues that arose during the day. “This time allowed me to reflect on my role and work with my peers to improve,” Nguyen said. “I’m thankful that the testing center created this role. These experiences can help us develop our leadership style and practice as we go into our jobs as full-time nurses.” 

Working at the testing center also helped Nguyen bridge the gap between didactic knowledge and practical nursing skills. “The testing site represents a crossroads of our nursing education, training, and experiences at clinical. At the center, we can practice practical skills like properly donning and doffing PPE, participate in patient education, and learn among peers,” she said. “The testing site offers opportunities for team management and building leadership skills.” 

Another student nurse who worked at the testing center spring 2021, Timothy Barksdale, also found that the experience connected directly to what he was learning in his classes. “I am learning about COVID procedures in all my clinicals and classes, so the PPE requirements and general knowledge is very intertwined,” he said. “This clinical has absolutely raised my confidence in patient care as a whole and with COVID specific protocols.” 

When Seneka Lea worked at the center during that same semester, she discovered there’s a lot more to the center than just swabbing noses and scanning test tubes. 

“I was surprised at the number of individuals tested at the Virginia campus everyday, and then more so at the Foggy Bottom campus. Before my experience, these numbers didn’t really mean anything to me,” she said. “But in understanding the importance of surveillance and contact tracing on preventing outbreaks in our GW community, it is impressive to see how many individuals we test on a weekly basis.” 

Lea learned something different from each of the three roles at the testing center. As a tester, she learned to ensure sample quality and to reassure patients (nasal swabs aren’t fun, she assures). As registrar, she fine-tuned customer service skills and attention to detail. And as charge nurse, she learned the importance of teamwork and assuming responsibility. 

Normally—when it’s not a pandemic—student nurses don’t get a lot of primary care experience, because their clinical experiences tend to focus on acute care.  

“This is a real chance for them to see how a primary care, very-specialized clinic works, and to see all the roles that go into making it happen. It gives a different experience than we’ve been able to provide in the past, and it really allows them to understand the full picture of what’s going on,” Dr. Tanner said. “It’s a hopefully once in a lifetime opportunity to work through a pandemic and to provide this service.” 

student wiping down chair
Nursing student volunteer wiping down chair

Student Innovations 

In addition to their assigned roles as registrar, tester, and charge nurse, students also kept their eyes and ears open and made an impact on important parts of the testing center processes, center staff said. 

One nursing student read the label on a sanitizer bottle and questioned testers taking the swabbed specimens where they needed to go and only then coming back and sanitizing chairs. The instructions said the sanitizer had to sit for a minute before cleaning to be effective. After the student approached staff with that realization, the center process changed. Now, testers spray the chair and let the sanitizer sit while they deliver the specimen. By testers’ return, the sanitizer has done its magic and is ready to be wiped down. 

On another occasion, students got the idea to help Spanish-speaking facilities and housekeeping staff on the Virginia campus understand more about COVID in their mother tongue. One of the students, who was fluent in Spanish, provided the text for the educational materials. “The students felt that it was very important to do this project,” Deyo said. “It was so well received.” 

“The students were really picking up on knowledge deficits among groups of people coming in to get tested and were able to put together educational materials to address that,” Dr. Tanner said. “They served a really good role. They were the ones who noticed that and brought it to the faculty, who were overseeing and working with them.” 

In another instance, students suggested minimizing the distance between the donning and doffing site and testing booths, so they wouldn’t have to walk through the entire testing center in full PPE. A new, closer space was identified, with the students’ help, and students set it up, sanitized it, and arranged supplies, Deyo said. 

In normal times, students have less of an opportunity to bring fresh sets of eyes and ears in their clinicals and to provide feedback that revolutionizes processes, according to Dr. Tanner. 

“Absolutely, there are people who may have those ideas, but the nature of this being a new clinic, really gave them more a sense of freedom to go ahead and say, ‘Hey. I’m seeing this,’” he said. “When you’re a student and you’re going into a well-established clinical site, you see something, but you may wonder why they do that. You may ask that question, but it’s not going to be very typical—I certainly know that as a student I wouldn’t have felt comfortable being like, ‘Hey. You guys should change this.’”

student administering flu vaccine
Nursing student administering flu vaccine

Looking Ahead 

As Dr. Drenkard thinks back on all that GW was able to accomplish with its COVID testing, she thinks the university sits squarely in the top tier of those who showed leadership in pandemic management and surveillance. “The capacity to stand something up quickly and to use students who are in clinical training as a resource—these are all really important assets,” she said. 

Dr. Drenkard also thinks that the testing center broadcasts an important and broad message about nursing. “As a profession, we’ve struggled a little bit to really shine as leaders, and this was an example of a combination of so many things going together,” she said. “Nursing and nurses taking on leadership and a nurse-led testing site and center shows what can happen and shows people what nurses are capable of.” 

There will almost certainly be testing in some form over the summer, and the hope is that need will greatly reduce by the fall.  

Now that COVID vaccinations are more prominent, the testing center has shifted to reduced hours. But there is still a potential role the center will play in vaccinations going forward.  

It was able to do that with a flu vaccine clinic that the Nursing School stood up adjacent to the COVID-19 testing center, which provided flu vaccines in two weeks to everyone reporting to the Virginia campus who wasn’t already vaccinated. “The thing that we could really look at and see how we can incorporate is working on vaccination clinics,” Dr. Tanner said. 

“It’s great to know we can do it on such a short time frame and make it effective. We hope that we don’t have to do it again that quickly,” he said of the COVID testing center. “Academics are made to move kind of slow and deliberate; it’s not the same thing as the clinical environment. But knowing that we were able to do that is a great thing to know and if we have a similar situation—which goodness I hope we don’t—it’s great to know that we were able to do that.” 

Dr. Sakallaris agreed. “There’s going to be another crisis at some point, so this is the lesson that I would take away from that: When there’s a crisis looming, take a look at what your students can do, what can they learn from this, and how can we marry those two things. I think that’s been the most valuable thing,” she said. 

“When there is a crisis, when there is something new going on, it’s a significant opportunity for learning for your students. Use that. Staffing this with student nurses is unique,” she added. “Other places have tested college students, but they’ve used contract labor and that sort of thing. I don’t know of any other place that has used their student nurses.” 

And, of course, their flu vaccination clinic is likely to return in future flu seasons, as it has operated in the past. “It is a really good opportunity for student nurses to do IM (intramuscular) injections,” Deyo said. 

AUTHOR Menachem Wecker


Nursing Resilience Amid Disruptive Times

GW Nursing volunteer at COVID testing site

The year 2020 was supposed to be special at the George Washington University School of Nursing. The World Health Organization had designated 2020 as the International Year of the Nurse and the Midwife, and the school was to celebrate its 10th anniversary. Dean Pamela Jeffries was planning an April gala at the Army and Navy Club, and programming would, Janus-like, look retrospectively on the past decade and ahead to the next 10 promising years.  

“That was a big deal for us,” said Dr. Jeffries. “We were ecstatic.” 

Then the pandemic hit, postponing the gala first a few months to August, and then subsequently a year to April 2021. With students and families needing support more than ever, GW Nursing brought new urgency to scholarship campaigns already underway, and the school continued to plan a health summit—albeit in digital form—addressing educational gaps in health professions.  

“We have to stay current with timely topics and needs within our health care profession,” Dr. Jeffries said. 

Helming a school amid a pandemic isn’t easy, but adapting and even shining under pressure in uncertain, stressful circumstances is muscle memory for nurses, whose patients’ conditions may fluctuate by the minute. “We deal with uncertainty all the time,” Dr. Jeffries said. “If I’m in patient care, my Tuesday looks different from my Wednesday. The practice environment changes by the day. So does the academic one.” 

As a nurse with a background in critical care, Jeffries was familiar with the need to be ready for change. “I could have a pretty stable patient come in the unit at 10, but by 11, he could be in respiratory arrest or cardiac arrest,” she said. “I always had to be prepared to deal with emergencies, because I never knew what emergency might be in front of me.” 

The past few months have been exceedingly difficult for almost everyone, and these have been particularly trying times for nurses on the front lines of the public health crisis, as well as for their colleagues in the nursing academic setting. As the pandemic rages amid a period of social unrest and protests demanding social justice, it’s more important than ever for nurses and nurse faculty to prioritize self-care and their own mental health in addition to aiding their patients and students. 

Stories of GW Nursing faculty, staff, students and alumni could fill many tomes, but here is a sketch of several important happenings in and around the school’s community.  

GW Nursing COVID Testing helpers

A Drastic Change 

When COVID-19 hit, Dr. Jeffries drew upon her nursing experience to think critically and to prioritize what to do first, second and third. “We just take command,” she said of nurses broadly. “We’re operational. We just lock in.” 

On March 13, the school moved to a fully remote workforce, with faculty, staff and student safety being the paramount concern. At the time, people weren’t wearing masks, but Dr. Jeffries instructed everyone to go home and mitigate risk by doing things like washing hands extra carefully. After addressing safety, she said she turned her attention to what her faculty and staff needed “to maintain structural continuity and to make sure that our students can progress.” For those slated to graduate in May, there was concern over how to ensure they met vital competencies.  

Concerned about staff morale, Jeffries set up weekly meetings with managers and directors to ask what they needed and to talk about how best to support a remote workforce. The meetings helped them calibrate. “That’s what we do as nurses,” she said. “We look at human responses. We look at whether they are stressed, anxious or sad.” 

Jeffries also set up weekly town hall meetings with faculty and staff, which continue to draw more than 100 participants. “We’re here together. We’re a community,” she told the group. “Nurses build community, because when you’re caring for a patient, you include the family. Do they have the resources they need? I don’t want to give someone a prescription for a medication they can’t fill.”  

After reassuring the GW Nursing community, Jeffries emphasized the importance of discussion. “As nurses, we communicate well. We are the most trusted profession,” she said. She placed transparency and team building at the forefront of the school’s administrative response. The environment she fostered broadcast to the entire school community that everyone was in this together. 

“That communication link was important. They were hearing from me. I was giving them all the information I had in real time. That was crucial,” she said. “That carried over from my nursing days when establishing a line of communication with your patients was your top priority.” 

Every town hall meeting, Dr. Jeffries ends with an inspirational quote. “In the beginning, I would bring those, but now I have faculty or staff closing the meetings with their own quotes.” She also had to slow herself down at points, knowing she tends to operate at warp speed. 

“Sometimes I had to remind myself, ‘Hey Pam. Pause here. Let them catch up.’ As dean, I might see the big picture ahead of other people, or I might have a vision that others don’t see,” she said. “As a leader, it’s important to tap into your emotional intelligence to know that when you lead, you have to bring your team along. You can’t be so far ahead.” 

Meetings of a critical-decision team Dr. Jeffries assembled, which had been a daily occurrence at the outset of the pandemic, scaled back to thrice weekly, and now are held two times a week. The team had succeeded in keeping the school up and running in the face of so much uncertainty. “Things were changing rapidly,” Dr. Jeffries said of the early days. “As a leader, you’ve got to be flexible and nimble.” 

Among the things the team has tackled are procuring remote proctoring software for exams delivered digitally, unifying communication so there are no mixed messages going out to different parts of the community, and “Fun Fridays,” where faculty and staff gather online for half an hour to discuss things other than work.  

The latter was in its 24th week at the time of the interview in August, and Dr. Jeffries said participants had shared with the group pictures of their children, of a road trip to Niagara Falls, of home remodeling and renovations, and of pets. One brought the trivia game Kahoot! for everyone to play, and another shared about a new mask-making hobby. Dr. Jeffries showed the group rocks she paints and leaves on a path for people to take or move around.  

“It’s nothing but fun,” she said. “It becomes a stress release.” 

Looking forward, Dr. Jeffries has no more access than anyone else to a crystal ball, but she has seen promising signs in the way GW Nursing has rallied together as a community. The faculty and staff have exceeded Dr. Jeffries’ expectations in their kindness and support, and the prior week, a student anonymously gifted $7,000 in support of scholarships. “It’s wonderful to know this particular student felt so supported through this stressful time that she wanted to acknowledge it through philanthropy,” Dr. Jeffries said. “For the student, $7,000 was probably a lot of money.” 

Dr. Jeffries added that pandemic has been compounded by social unrest and protesting following the May 25 death of George Floyd. With the help of Sandra Davis, assistant dean for diversity, equity and inclusion, Dr. Jeffries penned a message to the public stating unequivocally that the school will not tolerate racism, bias and discrimination and the continuing cycle of health inequities across our nation. Every Tuesday at 7 p.m., the school holds virtual forums called “Continuing the Conversation,” to discuss structural racism.  

“We’ve embraced the need to bring more awareness and change to systemic racism and doing so requires us to bring  anti-racism into our classrooms, into our working relationships, and when we are in clinical settings,” Dr. Jeffries said. She is inspired by the vulnerable and highly personal stories shared by many faculty, staff and students, and is proud that the school has fostered an environment where members of the community feel safe doing so. 

One person, a black woman, shared with the group that at least while quarantined at home during the pandemic, she no longer worries about the safety of her children, who are black teenagers. “That was heavy,” Dr. Jeffries said. “People haven’t walked in other people’s shoes. Those stories were so striking.” 

Ric Ricciardi and Army Surgeon General
LTG R. Scott Dingle, Army Surgeon General with Dr. Ricciardi

Duty Calls

If life were a movie, a grizzled Richard “Ric” Ricciardi would have been splitting firewood at the end of a long driveway when Department of Defense officials drove up and told him the world needed him to come back to work. It wasn’t that dramatic, but the DOD certainly caught Ricciardi off guard when it asked for his help to lead COVID-19 operations and public health response at General Leonard Wood Army Community Hospital at Fort Leonard Wood in Missouri. 

“Originally, I was shocked to be honest with you. I was retired from military service. I just figured I would never put on a uniform again,” said Dr. Ricciardi, director of strategic partnerships at GW’s Center for Health Policy and Media Engagement and a professor of nursing. He is also president of Sigma Theta Tau, the international nursing honor society. 

The military’s ask wasn’t that unusual, however. As a 66P (family nurse practitioner), Dr. Ricciardi had worked at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and he was very familiar with public health models. Where most Army colonels had retired or were working in administrative roles, Dr. Ricciardi kept one foot in clinical practice his entire career and was still certified to practice as a nurse practitioner in Maryland. 

“It really wasn’t my Ph.D. that got me called back. It was that I was still practicing as a clinician,” he said. “For me, they kind of got a twofer.”  

When the initial shock wore off, Dr. Ricciardi felt a sense of pride and honor. “I’ve always been very proud of this country, the American dream and what the country stands for,” he said. “To be asked by the Department of Defense to participate in a national emergency—I felt honored to be asked. If your nation calls and really needs you, if there’s something I can do to make the world a little bit better during a national emergency, I definitely should consider it.” 

Before making the big decision, Dr. Ricciardi talked to his wife—who was supportive—and to Dr. Jeffries, who gave him the green light on GW’s end. He said yes to the DOD, received his orders, and then things moved very quickly.   

At the fort, Dr. Ricciardi works out of an old dental clinic overseeing screening of incoming populations and setting the fort’s public health responses to prevent potential spread of the virus among trainees. Part of that means designing training “bubbles” for recruits and arranging sleeping accommodations in safe ways. (Trainees sleep head-to-feet and feet-to-head.) Dr. Ricciardi didn’t want to identify the fort’s population but said he has screened people “in the thousands.” 

“When conducting training in the field in a COVID environment, it’s about really trying to figure out if there are other ways to do something, like scaling a wall, in a different way, or questioning whether that activity is really something that is required in the training to ensure competence. Can that be left out? Can you just have the person do it on their own?” he said. “The critical element is trying to have reasonable assurance that when people are training together that you have done all that you can to minimize the risk of COVID transmission, such as removing the individuals that either have COVID or are at risk for developing COVID.” 

In high-pressure conditions, self-care is important for health care workers too, and Dr. Ricciardi relaxes by going on walks in the nearby Ozark Mountains. (He posts his stunning flora and fauna photos on Flickr and also writes poetry.) “It’s one way for me to unwind,” he said. “I’d never been to this part of the country before, so it’s quite striking how beautiful the countryside is. The good news is you’re out in the countryside by yourself. There’s no risk of COVID.” 

Dr. Ricciardi said photography and writing help him escape temporarily from overwhelming times with the global economic challenges, systemic racism and the pandemic. But looking forward, he is optimistic about some of the promises of telemedicine and virtual health care, which can handle certain health conditions more efficiently, and cheaply, than an in-person office visit.  

“COVID, in some ways, has been an opportunity for health care to advance and improve its efficiencies, effectiveness and customer service via telehealth and other modalities,” he said. “The paradigm of primary care will change to allow for more of this innovation around telehealth to be incorporated routinely in a visit.” 

“I think consumers are going to demand it and say, ‘I didn’t have to get in my car and drive. I could actually see my provider without leaving work. It worked out well. Why can’t I keep doing that?’” he added. “I suspect for certain kinds of medical issues, consumers will demand it.”      

GW Nursing pediatric clinical education instructors Kristen Stevens, Betsy Choma, Jennifer Walsh
(from left to right) Kristen Stevens, Betsy Choma, Jennifer Walsh

Clinical Simulations 

Pediatric clinical education instructors Betsy Choma, Kristen Stevens and Jennifer Walsh, who work as a team, have also found ways to adapt to social distancing requirements in ways they think will improve teaching even after there is a readily accessible and effective vaccine. 

When the pandemic forced hospitals to turn away nursing students for clinical rotations, the three instructors put their heads together to find a solution. In mid-March, one cohort of students still had a few weeks left, but the summer group needed to do its entire clinical component virtually. 

It was helpful to know ahead of time for the summer that the three would be designing the didactic (lecture) and clinical portions to complement one another, according to Choma. “The three of us were able to sit down and plan out, ‘OK. If we are talking about respiratory in lecture, let’s have respiratory case studies in clinical,” she said. 

When students see patients in hospitals, they never know what patient they will get at any given hour of any given day, but simulation allows for more customization. “It’s actually nice to be able to tailor and bring the student into the virtual classroom,” Choma said.  

The three could essentially put their pedagogic fingers on the digital scale and design vignettes to ensure students got to see, virtually, every relevant kind of patient. That gave both depth and breadth to the learning, and could bring examples virtually—say of child abuse or vaccine hesitation—that students otherwise wouldn’t necessarily experience. 

In an unexpected way, the virtual nature actually brought the patients to life, Choma added. 

“There are pros and cons of both. We obviously would love our students performing patient care. We’re nurses. That’s what we train for. That’s what we all want,” Walsh said. “With the COVID pandemic, we didn’t really have that opportunity, but we still had to provide a quality education to these students to get them out into the workforce.” Providing the course online allowed for “more synchronously connecting the didactic and clinical learning.” 

The program had previously used simulations and in-person teaching, and Stevens said the three of them found the two approaches to dovetail well. “In simulation you have a safer environment, and you can try things without the same degree of consequence, and so the thinking is very different,” she said. “Versus when there’s a child crying in front of you when you have to talk to the parent.” 

In the fall, students will be learning in hospitals and virtually, and the trio expects even when everything returns to normal to continue to tailor simulations to lecture topics. “As our pediatric curriculum features simulated patients and scenarios increasingly, we look forward to maximizing use of our high-quality simulation lab,” Choma said. “I think we are really going to see the value of simulated scenarios, because we can’t predict the outcomes, but we can control the environment.” 

“We learned so much with this transition to virtual,” Walsh said. “I think there’s no doubt that we will continue to evolve and continue to bring what works best for the students in the future.” 

Leah McElhanon, B.S.N. ’18, M.S.N. ’19

Finding the Silver Lining 

Before the pandemic changed everything, Leah McElhanon, B.S.N. ’18, M.S.N. ’19, had a plan. She was going to work at a clinic and save enough money until she could hang her own shingle. In March, she realized she had to detour. 

McElhanon was furloughed from the Dallas clinic where she worked. Unsure when she could return to work, she decided to volunteer at the Federal Medical Station in Santa Clara, Calif., as part of the medical team for the nonprofit Team Rubicon. There, she cared for COVID-19 patients before her deployment ended. 

Earlier this year, she started a pro bono practice on the side and began a new job recently as medical director for a COVID testing initiative, which she said is trying to find better and safer solutions to medical problems. (She didn’t want to say a whole lot more about the effort, which is in its infancy.) 

McElhanon has heard from former classmates and colleagues, and she said everyone is physically, mentally and emotionally worn. She felt some inertia initially, when there was some hope that there might be a big breakthrough, but she is prepared now for a long haul. 

Nursing school taught McElhanon to keep a poker face for the benefit of her patients, but in the face of COVID, it’s tough to be stoic. “It starts to wear on you,” she said. She currently has a very close family member in the hospital. Despite a resilient nature, she finds it devastating to be unable to care for her relative. Hospital policies bar visitors of any kind, which makes in-person support impossible. McElhanon went into the medical field to protect those close to her, but now she finds herself stuck at arm’s length due to the ongoing pandemic. 

“The nursing profession is needed now more than ever. Nurses are at the patient’s bedside 24/7, when their loved ones cannot be there,” McElhanon said. “The nurse’s presence ensures that the patient is never alone. In addition to their medical expertise, nurses are everything for the patient. They take on the roles of family, friend, advocate and much more.” 

Somehow, McElhanon sees a silver lining amid all the uncertainty. 

“We can’t change anything we did yesterday; we can only be better today,” she said. “Taking a step back and looking at what this experience is going to offer us. One thing is innovation in medicine. Right now, people are pushing in so many avenues for so many different medications and treatments and protocols. Researchers and medical professionals are out there trying everything that they can.” 

Medical professionals are starting to see that they can not only strive to help with the current pandemic, but also pioneer and push new boundaries. 

“Medicine is very foundational. Views and practices remain inside the box,” she said. “This silver lining is teaching us, ‘Let’s never think inside the box. Let’s keep going.’ I think this may benefit us in the long term. We may be able to identify and prevent viruses sooner. We might be able to predict how other viruses, with which we’re already struggling, infect and overtake the body. We might be able to cure some things that we’ve never been able to cure.” 

It’s really hard to try to find sources of optimism and positivity, she admitted. “But honestly, that’s what we need to do right now,” she said. “We will get through this. We can get through this. We just have to stay positive.” 

AUTHOR MENACHEM WECKER


Exploring New Avenues in Advanced Practice Nursing Education

simulation lab photos overlaid by advanced practice ahead yield sign

A growing and aging population, large numbers of students and competition for clinical sites have created a “traffic jam” in advanced practice nursing (APN) education. At the same time, with a growing provider shortage, it’s more important than ever that the profession efficiently produces well-prepared providers.

GW Nursing Dean Pamela Jeffries describes the state of nurse practitioner (NP) education as a “traffic jam” due to the lack of available clinical sites and the larger number of NP students compared to medical students. Many nursing leaders across the nation this year have taken steps to clear the roads, turning to simulation to supplement clinical education hours as another avenue to provide the clinical practice hours and competency testing for NP students. While accrediting organizations require that NP students undertake a minimum of 500 direct patient care clinical hours to prepare for their future role, many programs require hundreds more clinical hours. Simulation offers a way to clear congestion at clinical sites while ensuring students are prepared to deliver high-quality care.

 Health care simulation experts from professional organizations, schools and technology companies gathered in January of this year in Washington, D.C., to discuss how best to evaluate health care simulation in NP programs.

Hosted by the National Organization for Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF) and GW Nursing, the Thought Leaders’ Summit on Simulation in NP Education examined existing evidence, discussed the challenges of evaluation and began formulating next steps.

Then in March, more than 100 nursing educators attended GW Nursing’s second annual simulation conference, which this year focused on simulation in NP education.

State of the science

While a framework for the effective use of simulation is established at the pre-licensure nursing level, little evidence exists regarding simulation’s use in APN programs. 

NP education is fundamentally different from pre-licensure education and requires an entirely different approach from the established framework at the undergraduate level, said Mary Beth Bigley, CEO of NONPF.

“When we get to this level of education, standardized patient encounters have more value because it evaluates those higher-level skills,” Dr. Bigley said.

Carla Nye, clinical associate professor at the Virginia Commonwealth University School of Nursing, and Suzanne Campbell, associate professor at The University of British Columbia School of Nursing, previously surveyed the research related to simulation in NP education. Their examination of literature produced between 2010 and April 2015 found that a minimal number of research studies had been completed, the quality of studies was low, the studies used small sample sizes, the use of existing International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL) standards wasn’t known and there was a lack of standardized scenarios. An update of their work looking at research published between 2015 and 2019 did not show much improvement in the state of the science, Drs. Nye and Campbell said.

Despite its flaws, the existing body of research does offer promising outcomes, according to Drs. Nye and Campbell: Students like simulation and see its value; students self-report more confidence; simulation learning can be transferred to clinical settings; and simulation can improve communication skills. 

Drs. Nye and Campbell also conducted their own inquiry to describe the current use of simulation in advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) programs. The study was born of the research arm of a Simulation in Advanced Practice Nursing Task Force organized after discussions about APN simulation at the 2016 INACSL annual conference. 

Results of a descriptive survey sent to all APN programs in the United States and Canada show that a majority of the programs employed simulation up to 20 hours, with participants reporting a wide range of zero to more than 100 hours. Simulation is most frequently implemented in physical assessment courses, their survey showed, but it was also used in many other courses.

Schools most frequently reported using standardized patients (SPs), but the use of manikins, computer and virtual simulation, task trainers, interprofessional simulation, video recording and distance/telehealth was also reported. 

This survey also showed that 98 percent of respondents reported using simulation in their APN programs, and 77 percent of respondents supported the replacement of some percentage of clinical hours with simulation. Drs. Nye and Campbell stressed survey participants who chose to complete the survey may have a pro-simulation bias.

When we get to this level of education,
standardized patient encounters have more value because it evaluates those higher-level skills.”

Mary Beth Bigley

Barriers

The survey study conducted by Drs. Nye and Campbell found that faculty skill and staff support were the most reported barriers to simulation use. Programs reported additional barriers to simulation use in APN programs, such as an inconsistent course-by-course approach to simulation, an increase in student fees to pay for resources, competition with undergraduate simulation resources and distance education. 

In small working groups, summit attendees identified forces that inhibit the adoption of simulation in achieving NP competencies. Lack of resources and equity of resources between programs led the list, with limited faculty knowledge and skills and a dearth of peer-reviewed literature also emerging as major areas of concern.

Educators evaluate an NP student’s ability to obtain a patient health history, conduct a physical exam, work through a diagnosis and create a management plan. All of these skills are based on critical thinking rather than manual skills, Dr. Bigley said.

Standardized patients are considered the highest-fidelity level of simulation, but the resources required to both train and pay SPs were repeatedly cited as a barrier. 

NP education is already undergoing a major shift, with programs working toward compliance with the goal of a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) as the entry to practice by 2025. 

“NONPF is committed to the DNP as the entry degree by 2025. NP practice should be at the DNP level,” said Lorna Finnegan, executive associate dean at the University of Illinois at Chicago and NONPF president.

Need for adoption

Despite the challenges and complications, NP educators agree that simulation will only grow in its value to the field. 

Emerging evidence shows that learning does occur during simulation experiences, said Angela McNelis, associate dean for scholarship, innovation and clinical science, at GW Nursing. 

Reliance on the current precepted clinical model is a challenge to sustain or expand, so educators must focus on maximizing student time in clinical settings and exploring alternative models, she said.

The demands and technology savviness of this generation of learners dominated the summit’s discussions about the need for adoption of simulation. 

Current evidence shows that students report increased confidence, decreased anxiety and communication skills development in simulation scenarios, Dr. McNelis said. 

Faculty members who work closely with students know that simulation works, said Pamela Slaven-Lee, senior associate dean for academic affairs at GW Nursing. “We’re in the rooms with the students, and we see the light bulb come on. We see the learning, we know it’s happening, and we need the research so we can move forward. Our undergraduate colleagues are ahead of us,” Dr. Slaven-Lee said.

Current students are digital natives, Christine Pintz, professor at GW Nursing, said during the panel presentation at the March conference. “These are individuals who understand the simulation process and also want this process,” she said.

Anecdotal evidence also reinforces the openness to including simulation in NP programs, with one attendee sharing that her colleagues call simulation “on-campus clinical hours.”

Moving forward

To address the need for a standardized, efficient, sustainable model for NP clinical education, a team led by Drs. Bigley and Jeffries presented their proposed study on “The Use of Simulation in Family Nurse Practitioner Education.” A white paper with a call to action regarding the need for more evidence to use simulations in NP clinical education is expected to be published later this year and should set the stage for a rigorous study. 

Evidence is needed through conducting multisite studies on NP clinical education to obtain evidence for new models of education. In the current environment, significant shortages of clinical sites, clinical preceptors and financial resources pose barriers to NP education. These barriers create an opportunity for educators to develop new models capitalizing on the strong tradition of preceptor-based clinical experiences and leveraging innovative and evidence-based simulations that meet national competencies and continue to prepare graduates for practice. As noted by Dr. Jeffries, the future can be accomplished if there is a concerted effort to generate evidence through robust and rigorous research on simulation in NP education. The current clinical model faces ongoing challenges and requires new thinking. It is time to be bold and institute new models that include evidence-based simulation. 

AUTHOR Erin julius


Simulation Is The Foundation

Simulation is the Foundation building blocks

Proponents of health care simulation education have said for years that it improves clinician performance and reduces patient safety errors, but until recently they have lacked the data and evidence to share with academic leaders and policymakers. 

Simulation education in health care has advanced rapidly in the past decade, due in large part to the efforts of nurse educators. The National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) in 2014 released the results of a landmark simulation study, which was followed up in 2015 by the publication of the National League for Nursing (NLN) Jeffries Simulation Theory. GW Nursing Dean Pamela Jeffries’ work as one of the consultants of the NCSBN study and her eponymous theory helped legitimize simulation education in pre-licensure nursing education. 

The NCSBN National Simulation Study examined the role and outcomes of simulation in pre-licensure nursing education. The study provided substantial evidence that simulation can be effectively substituted for up to 50 percent of traditional clinical experience in all pre-licensure nursing courses, under conditions comparable to high-quality, high-fidelity situations described in the study. 

The study results reaffirmed simulation education advocates’ belief in this type of experiential learning strategy while providing concrete data to address concerns held by simulation skeptics. The research team had its own skeptics—they were unsure of how well simulation could supplement traditional clinical experiences in certain areas, including mental health, pediatrics and obstetrics, but the data showed no significant differences as long as the correct simulation technique was used. 

“For me personally, it was those areas that the simulation worked for that surprised me a little, as someone who likes traditional clinical experiences,” said Nancy Spector, the NCSBN director of regulatory innovations and a consultant on the study.

Study results influence state policy

The NCSBN study marked a shift in how nursing schools and policymakers viewed simulation education. Each state’s board of nursing makes its own decisions regarding how much simulation can be used to supplement traditional clinical experiences in pre-licensure programs. After the NCSBN study was published, many states amended their policies and increased the amount of allowable simulation. “The study has had a really positive impact on what boards of nursing are allowing,” Dr. Spector said. There was no evidence before the study, so boards made arbitrary decisions regarding simulation, and some states didn’t allow any amount of simulation to be used to supplement clinical experiences. 

One year after the study was published, the NCSBN convened an expert panel to develop national simulation guidelines for pre-licensure nursing programs. These guidelines included evidence to support the use of simulation and information for faculty and program directors on how to incorporate high-quality, high-fidelity simulation in their programs. 

Since the NCSBN released these guidelines in 2015, more than half of all pre-licensure programs in the country have adopted them, according to a survey conducted by the NCSBN evaluating the simulation landscape. That survey also revealed that high-fidelity simulation use has substantially increased for almost all undergraduate courses since 2010. 

High-quality simulation fosters better student outcomes  

GW Nursing is committed to providing students with high-quality, high-fidelity experiences and has made significant investments in simulation under the direction of Dr. Jeffries, an innovator in promoting and advancing the field of simulation education. 

Recent renovations at Innovation Hall on GW’s Virginia Science and Technology Campus nearly doubled the simulation space available to nursing students. The new Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) center contains 12 patient exam rooms and two acute care rooms, bringing the total simulation space available to both undergraduate and graduate students to nearly 20,000 square feet. 

While the new OSCE space was designed for nurse practitioner students to improve their clinical skills, GW Nursing also recently invested $400,000 in upgrades to make simulation as comparable to a hospital setting as possible for undergraduate students, said Crystel Farina, the school’s director of simulation and experiential learning. Those upgrades include eight new moderate-fidelity simulators (manikins that breathe and have a pulse to practice certain skills, but with fewer features than high-fidelity manikins), new beds, IV pumps, medication dispensing machines and workstations on wheels. The school launched another renovation this spring that will add additional simulation and debriefing space, new technology, a virtual reality space and a simulated operating room.

As simulation director, Ms. Farina ensures that all of the school’s many simulation events run smoothly. Simulation is integrated throughout GW Nursing’s entire curriculum—every course has some sort of simulation experience in it, Ms. Farina said. “My role is to ensure that not only does the simulation continue, but that it’s high quality and meets the standards of best practice,” she said.

Those standards, which are set by the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL), were developed based on the NLN Jeffries Theory and the NCSBN guidelines. Nursing schools now have a solid framework and explicit standards to guide the development of high-quality simulation experiences. While the virtues of simulation as a teaching strategy are well established, Ms. Farina and other dedicated simulation educators are quick to point out that it’s crucial that students engage in high-quality, high-fidelity simulations. When simulations are conducted improperly, or not in accordance with the guidelines and standards set forth by NCSBN and INACSL, simulation can actually be harmful to students. 

In the early days of simulation use, instructors would purposefully introduce mistakes into a simulation in the hopes that students would catch the mistake, Ms. Farina said. “We didn’t know how important it was to the students’ self-esteem and to their socialization as a nurse if they didn’t catch the mistake,” she explains. 

The NLN Jeffries Theory set forth guidelines that simulation should be collaborative and transparent—the student, simulated patient (if one is used) and faculty should know exactly what’s expected and what the objectives are. 

“There’s no way students can meet the objective if they get caught up in how to program the IV pump,” Ms. Farina said.

Schools that implement high-quality and high-fidelity simulation have seen improvements in student performance and clinical confidence. “Anecdotally, we’re seeing much better outcomes from simulation now that we have the NLN Jeffries Theory,” Ms. Farina said. “Their ability to talk with each other and other care providers is definitely enhanced. Their teamwork is also much better—they’re able to work as a team, and they don’t see things as individual tasks.” 

Dr. Jeffries’ groundbreaking work has influenced nurse educators for years, even before the publication of the NCSBN study and her eponymous theory. Jeffries’ 2007 book, “Simulation in Nursing Education”, was Kellie Bryant’s go-to resource when she was hired as the director of simulation learning at New York University College of Nursing in 2008. 

“From my experience, her book was how a lot of us got started in simulation,” Dr. Bryant said. “I’m talking over 10 years ago when there weren’t conferences or other books or journals—that book was our template for simulation.” 

In her current role as executive director of simulation at Columbia School of Nursing, Dr. Bryant is using Dr. Jeffries’ evidence-based approach to developing high-quality simulations, with a focus on creating simulation experiences that address proper medication administration. “We know that medical errors are a leading cause of mortality and death, and a component of that is giving the wrong medication or the wrong dose,” she explained. 

Dr. Bryant and her colleagues began with manikin-based simulations, then moved on to using standardized patients (actors portraying patients) for students to practice the proper protocols, such as reading a patient’s chart correctly, conducting safety checks, scanning a patient’s identification band and more. “The clinical instructors in the hospital are reporting that students have stronger skills than in the past, and seem more comfortable with medication administration,” Dr. Bryant said. “That’s because of simulation, because of deliberate practice. Students understand the rationale, and realize for each step why it’s important to follow protocol.”

Best practices and certifications for simulation educators

Although Dr. Bryant relied heavily on Dr. Jeffries’ early books for guidance due to the lack of available training opportunities, she cautioned novice educators against jumping into simulation. 

“All schools are realizing that if they don’t have a simulation program or a simulation-based curriculum, then they’re behind the curve,” she said. “Everyone knows they have to use simulation, but people aren’t really prepared to utilize it the best way. You have to be trained, you have to have that theoretical background and you need to know what you’re doing.”

For aspiring simulation educators, that begins with securing support from their school’s leadership as well as procuring funds to attend a training program or conference. “Education is the key—before you can start using it with students and teaching other faculty, you have to know what you’re doing and have that expertise first to utilize it and to teach others,” Dr. Bryant said. 

Without simulation training and instruction on what qualifies as high quality and high fidelity, schools will be out of compliance with the NCSBN and INACSL standards.

Educators who are committed to advancing their simulation knowledge and skills can become professionally certified. The Society for Simulation in Healthcare developed its Certified Healthcare Simulation Educator (CHSE) certificate in 2012 to recognize educators for their expertise in simulation. The certification demonstrates that an individual is committed to simulation and has specialized skills and knowledge.

Nursing schools with CHSE-certified educators ensure that their simulation is high quality and high fidelity, which is key to following the standards and best practices set forth by the NCSBN simulation study and the subsequent guidelines. 

“If you have a CHSE-certified person in your simulation center, you have high quality and high fidelity,” Ms. Farina said. “It really does support what the study was requiring. A lot of schools out there are doing simulations but are completely missing that high-quality, high-fidelity piece because they don’t know the pedagogy.” 

Interprofessional simulation

While nurse educators have advanced the field of simulation and set the standards for assessing clinical skills, other health care professions have also been using simulation technology for years. 

Chad Epps, executive director at the Center for Healthcare Improvement and Patient Simulation at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center, recalls using a simulation-based model for practicing anesthesia during his medical residency program in 2001. “I learned how to use anesthesia on a simulator before I ever did it on a patient,” he said. “That left an impression on me in terms of its potential as an educational modality.”

Dr. Epps pursued his interest in education and simulation as he embarked on a career as an anesthesiologist. He became the director of simulation at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), where he started a program for nurse anesthetists and developed the curriculum, which included interprofessional simulation experiences. In his various simulation educator positions, Dr. Epps has pushed for more interprofessional experiences that mimic real-world clinical environments. 

“We graduate these professional health students, and they go into clinics and the clinical world, and they’re suddenly exposed to all of these other professions,” he explained. “In the past, [these students] never learned anything about those professions so they didn’t know what their role was, or what the other professions’ role was.” 

During his time at UAB, Dr. Epps and his colleagues developed simulation experiences for nursing and medical students that included specific competencies developed by the Interprofessional Educational Collaborative with intentional objectives related to the Team Strategies & Tools to Enhance Performance & Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) teamwork system for health care professionals designed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Studies have shown that hospitals that implement TeamSTEPPS have improved patient outcomes, and Dr. Epps wanted the medical and nursing students to become familiar with that model of communication. 

“At first, students thought [the interprofessional simulation] felt very strange,” he said. “But it got to the point where if we did a simulation with just medical students and the nursing students weren’t there, they’d look around and say, ‘Where are the nursing students, something’s wrong.’”

In addition to increasing interprofessional experiences among health care students, Dr. Epps said he expects to see simulation used more widely among health care providers to improve patient safety. “We shouldn’t just use simulation for students, we should use simulation for practicing professionals,” he said. “The airline industry has done this—if you’re a commercial pilot, you have to go through simulation every six months or you risk losing your license. We don’t have that in health care yet, although we probably need it.” 

Where does simulation go from here?

Simulation-based curricula and the use of simulation have been adopted by the majority of pre-licensure nursing programs. Our work continues in conducting the research to design best practices and to learn more about how simulation-based experiences affect student learning and, ultimately, patient outcomes and quality, safe care. 

AUTHOR meredith lidard kleeman